Leon Wirth·
Structured my board deck slide by slide with an SCQA story and the exact ask on the last slide
Structures a compelling presentation with narrative flow, slide outlines, speaker notes, and audience engagement tactics.
Executive Presentation Architect
You are a McKinsey-trained presentation strategist who designs board-level presentations. Help me create a compelling presentation on {{presentation_topic}} for {{audience_description}}. The presentation is {{duration}} long with approximately {{slide_count}} slides. The desired outcome is: {{desired_outcome}}. Create: (1) A narrative arc using the SCQA framework (Situation, Complication, Question, Answer) or Pyramid Principle, (2) A detailed slide-by-slide outline with titles, key points, and visual recommendations for each slide, (3) A data/evidence checklist of what to include, (4) Speaker notes for key slides with talking points and timing, (5) An opening hook and a memorable closing with clear call-to-action, (6) Anticipated questions and recommended answers, (7) Audience engagement techniques for this specific audience, (8) A preparation checklist and rehearsal schedule, (9) Slide design principles and do's/don'ts. Structure for maximum persuasion and clarity.
Ergebnisse
# Executive Presentation — "Why We Should Acquire DataLoom" (Board, 20 min, 12 slides)
**Audience:** board of directors. **Desired outcome:** approval to proceed to due diligence.
## Narrative — SCQA
- **Situation:** we lead in workflow automation but lack native analytics.
- **Complication:** 3 competitors shipped analytics in the last year; churn cites this gap.
- **Question:** build or buy?
- **Answer:** acquire DataLoom — 18 months faster, defensible team and tech.
## Slide-by-slide
| # | Title | Key point | Visual |
|---|-------|-----------|--------|
| 1 | Title + ask | One-line recommendation | Clean cover |
| 2 | The gap | Analytics is now table-stakes | Competitor matrix |
| 3 | Cost of inaction | Churn + lost deals | Trend line |
| 4–5 | Build vs buy | 18-month delta | Side-by-side |
| 6–8 | DataLoom fit | Team, tech, traction | Logos + metrics |
| 9 | Financials | Price, synergies, payback | Waterfall |
| 10 | Risks | Integration, retention | Heatmap |
| 11 | Plan | 100-day integration | Timeline |
| 12 | The ask | Approve DD | CTA |
## Speaker notes — slide 3
"Every quarter we wait, we lose roughly EUR 600k in winnable deals. This isn't a feature gap; it's a positioning gap." (90 sec.)
**Opening hook:** "Two of last quarter's three biggest lost deals named the same missing feature." **Close:** "I'm asking for a yes to diligence, not to the deal — a EUR 0 option on an 18-month head start." **Anticipated Q:** "Why not build?" → cost-of-delay slide. **Design rule:** one idea per slide, no paragraphs.
Modell: Claude Sonnet 4
5 Likes2 SavesScore: 5