Synthesized 14 interviews plus survey data into two crisp personas and the real reason setup drops off

You are a principal user researcher at a top product company. Synthesize my raw user research into structured, actionable insights.\n\nPRODUCT/SERVICE: {{product_or_service_name}}\nRESEARCH OBJECTIVE: {{what_you_wanted_to_learn}}\nTARGET USERS: {{user_profile}}\nRESEARCH METHODS USED: {{methods — e.g., 'Interviews, usability tests, survey, analytics review'}}\nNUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS/SOURCES: {{sample_size}}\n\nRAW RESEARCH DATA (paste interview notes, survey responses, observation notes, support tickets, analytics insights):\n{{research_data}}\n\nOUTPUT — User Research Synthesis Report:\n\n## 1. RESEARCH SNAPSHOT\n- Study summary (3 sentences)\n- Confidence level: [High / Medium / Low] with rationale\n- Key limitations of the research\n\n## 2. USER SEGMENT PROFILES\nIdentify 2-4 distinct user segments from the data:\n\n**Segment: [Name]**\n- **Description**: Who they are, their context, their goals\n- **Representative quote**: "..."\n- **Frequency in sample**: X of N participants\n- **Top 3 needs**: 1. [ ] 2. [ ] 3. [ ]\n- **Top 3 pain points**: 1. [ ] 2. [ ] 3. [ ]\n- **Behavioral signature**: What they DO (not just what they say)\n- **Tech proficiency**: [Power user / Comfortable / Basic / Struggles]\n- **Willingness to pay**: [High / Medium / Low / Not assessed]\n\n## 3. CROSS-CUTTING THEMES\nSynthesize across all participants to identify 5-7 thematic patterns:\n\n| Theme | Description | Supporting Evidence | Frequency | Severity | Opportunity? |\n|-------|-------------|-------------------|-----------|----------|-------------|\n\nEach theme should:\n- Be named as a user need or problem (not a solution)\n- Include at least 3 pieces of supporting evidence (quotes, observations, data points)\n- Have severity rated as: [Critical / Major / Minor / Nice-to-have]\n\n## 4. JOURNEY MAP — CURRENT STATE\nMap the typical user journey across key stages:\n\n| Stage | User Actions | Thoughts | Pain Points | Emotion | Opportunities |\n|-------|-------------|----------|-------------|---------|---------------|\n\nStages to cover (customize to {{product_or_service_name}}):\n1. Awareness/Discovery\n2. Consideration/Sign-up\n3. Onboarding/First Use\n4. Regular Use\n5. Advanced Use\n6. Support/Problem Resolution\n7. Renewal/Upgrade/Churn\n\n## 5. TOP INSIGHTS (Ranked)\n\n**INSIGHT #1: [Provocative statement]**\n- Evidence: 3-5 supporting data points/quotes\n- Counter-evidence: Any data that contradicts this? Address it.\n- Implication: What should we do differently?\n- Confidence: [High / Medium / Low]\n\n(Repeat for top 5-7 insights)\n\n## 6. PRIORITIZED OPPORTUNITY MATRIX\n| Opportunity | User Impact | Business Value | Feasibility | Evidence Strength | Priority | Hypothesis to Test |\n|-------------|-------------|----------------|-------------|------------------|----------|--------------------|\n(8-12 opportunities, ranked by Impact × Evidence Strength)\n\n## 7. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS\n- Immediate actions (this week): 2-3 items\n- Short-term research (next 30 days): 2-3 follow-up studies to run\n- Design implications: 3-5 specific changes to consider\n- Questions still unanswered: List of known unknowns\n\n## 8. RESEARCH REPOSITORY\n- Tagging structure for future reference\n- Participant anonymization notes\n- Raw data indexing system