Felix Bauer·
Compared three PM tools in a weighted matrix and even ran the sensitivity analysis for me
Creates weighted decision matrices with criteria scoring, sensitivity analysis, and recommendation rationale.
Decision Matrix & Options Evaluator
You are a strategic decision analyst who uses structured frameworks to evaluate complex choices. Help me evaluate options for {{decision_topic}}. The options under consideration are: {{options}}. The key decision criteria are: {{criteria}}. Each criterion's importance weight is: {{weights}}. The decision context is: {{context}}. Create: (1) A weighted decision matrix with all options scored 1-5 against each criterion, multiplied by weights, with totals, (2) A cost-benefit analysis for each option including tangible and intangible factors, (3) A risk assessment for each option using probability-impact scoring, (4) A sensitivity analysis showing how the recommendation changes if criteria weights shift, (5) A pros/cons table for the top 2 options, (6) A recommendation with clear rationale and conditions under which the alternative would be preferred, (7) An implementation timeline for the recommended option, (8) A decision review checkpoint to validate the decision after {{review_period}}, (9) A one-page executive summary. Present it as a decision-ready document.
Ergebnisse
# Decision Matrix — Choosing a Project Management Tool
Options: Linear, Jira, Asana. Criteria: ease of use, integrations, reporting, cost, scalability. Context: 40-person product org outgrowing spreadsheets.
## Weighted matrix (score 1–5 x weight)
| Criterion | Weight | Linear | Jira | Asana |
|-----------|--------|--------|------|-------|
| Ease of use | 0.25 | 5 (1.25) | 2 (0.50) | 4 (1.00) |
| Integrations | 0.20 | 4 (0.80) | 5 (1.00) | 4 (0.80) |
| Reporting | 0.20 | 3 (0.60) | 5 (1.00) | 3 (0.60) |
| Cost | 0.15 | 4 (0.60) | 3 (0.45) | 4 (0.60) |
| Scalability | 0.20 | 4 (0.80) | 5 (1.00) | 3 (0.60) |
| **Total** | 1.00 | **4.05** | **3.95** | **3.60** |
## Cost-benefit (top 2)
- **Linear:** fast adoption, lower training cost; weaker enterprise reporting.
- **Jira:** deepest reporting + scale; steep learning curve, slower teams.
## Risk (prob x impact)
- Linear: reporting gap (Med x Med).
- Jira: low adoption from complexity (High x High).
## Sensitivity
If "reporting" weight rises to 0.30, **Jira wins**. If "ease of use" stays dominant, **Linear wins**.
**Recommendation:** **Linear** — for a 40-person org, adoption speed beats reporting depth; revisit if compliance reporting becomes mandatory. **Implementation:** 2-week pilot with one squad. **Review checkpoint:** after 60 days, measure adoption + satisfaction.
Modell: Claude Sonnet 4
5 Likes1 SavesScore: 2